Camas Prairie, Elmore County, Idaho

Tag Archives: hearings and meetings

Who Doesn’t Want Cat Creek Energy to get Rights to Anderson Ranch Reservoir Water?

In May 2017, Cat Creek Energy, LLC applied to draw 101,000 acre-feet of water from the South Fork of the Boise River water basin. This water would actually be pumped up to a new reservoir on Little Camas Prairie from Anderson Ranch Reservoir via a series of penstocks located across the lake from Evans Creek Campground.

Anderson Ranch Reservoir, 2018.

This proposed new reservoir, Cat Creek Reservoir, is scheduled to be built just one mile or so north of Little Camas Reservoir and very close to three possible greater sage grouse nesting grounds, called a “lek.”

September 24, 2018, marked the deadline for individuals, groups and even other government agencies to file a protest against Cat Creek Energy’s water permit with the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR). By that deadline, 19 protests were filed against that water permit application.

Who Are Those 19 Protesters?

Here are just some of the names:

  1. The Boise office of the Bureau of Reclamation (
  2. The Idaho Conservation League (
  3. The Boise Project Board of Control (
  4. SUEZ Water Idaho, Inc. (
  5. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (
  6. The City of Boise City (
  7. A consortium of water related companies and irrigation districts that include: Ballentyne Ditch Company, Boise Valley Irrigation Ditch Company, Canyon County Water Company, Eureka Water Company, Farmers’ Co-operative Ditch Company, Middleton Mill Ditch Company, Middleton Irrigation Association, Inc., Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, New Dry Creek Ditch Company, Pioneer Ditch Company, Pioneer Irrigation District, Settlers Irrigation District, South Boise Water Company, and Thurman Mill Ditch Company.
  8. S Bar Ranch (Facebook @SBarRanch or

Again this is just eight of the 19 entities that filed a protest for many different and various legal/practical reasons.

These 19 protest letters filed with the Idaho Department of Water Resources tells us that the Cat Creek Energy pumped-storage hydroelectric facility is an ill-conceived plan.

IDFG is concerned that the requested water diversion and associated hydroelectric project could adversely affect important public fisheries and Endangered Species Act protected bull trout populations within affected river and reservoir reaches of the Boise River system.~ Idaho Department of Fish and Game

Reference: Water-Permit-Protests-CatCreekEnergyOct2018.pdf at

Mailing Addresses for Cat Creek Energy Issues

Contact Information for Cat Creek Energy Issues

Last updated on March 5, 2019

Idaho’s Senior Senator
U.S. Senator Mike Crapo
239 Dirksen Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510

Phone: 202-224-6142

Idaho’s Freshman Senator
U.S. Senator James E. Risch
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Phone: 202-224-2752

Idaho’s 1st Congressional District
Congressman Russ Fulcher
1520 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Phone: 202-225-6611

Idaho’s 2nd Congressional District
Congressman Mike Simpson
2084 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

Phone: 202-225-5531

Idaho’s Governor
Governor Brad Little
State Capitol
PO Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720

Phone: 208-334-2100

Idaho District 23 State Representatives

District 23 Senator:

(While in Session Contact Info)
Senator Bert Brackett
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0081

Phone: 208-332-1336


(Not in Session Contact Info)
Senator Bert Brackett
48331 Three Creek Highway
Rogerson, Idaho 83302

Home Phone: 208-857-2217

District 23A Representative:

(While in Session Contact Info)
Representative Christy Zito
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0038

Phone: 208-332-1181


(Not in Session Contact Info)
Representative Christy Zito
8821 Old Highway 30
Hammett, Idaho 83627

Home Phone: 208-590-4633

District 23B Representative:

(While in Session Contact Info)
Representative Megan Blanksma
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0038

Phone: 208-332-1054


(Not in Session Contact Info)
Representative Megan Blanksma
595 S. Thacker Road
Hammett, Idaho 83627

Home Phone: 208-366-7976
Campaign Website:

General Correspondence to the BOCC:

150 South 4th East
Mountain Home, ID 83647

Online Feedback and Correspondence

As of March 1, 2019, an online form was made available at:

Commissioner Phone Numbers :

Bud Corbus – Phone: 208-587-2129 ext. 505 / Home Phone: 208-599-1294
Wes Wootan – Phone: 208-587-2129 ext. 505 / Home Phone: 208-599-3131
Al Hofer – Phone: 208-587-2129 ext. 505 / Home Phone: 208-599-1620

Communication During BOCC Meeting Involving Cat Creek Energy

Elmore County Commissioner (mail goes to P & Z for Cat Creek Energy issues)
Elmore County Land Use and Building Department
520 East 2nd South Street
Mountain Home, Idaho, 83647


Possible Elmore County Email Addresses

NOTE: Kacey Ramsauer was the official POC for CCE issues in the recent past.

IMPORTANT: Make sure you ask that official enter the documents into the record and confirm this has been done by return email.


Cat Creek Energy Corporate Offices

Cat Creek Energy LLC
398 S. 9th St., Ste 240
Boise, ID 853701

Mountain Home Mayor

City of Mountain Home
ATTN: Mayor Dick Sykes
160 South 3rd East Street
Mountain Home, ID 83647



County Rules in Favor of S Bar Ranch on Development Agreement

On Friday, September 7, 2018, a group of concerned citizens attended the Elmore County Commissioners weekly meeting to hear our local government officials deliberate on two separate Cat Creek Energy project issues. This is what happened at the meeting.

Deliberation #1 – A Loss for the Residents of Elmore County

The first deliberations of the day dealt with a July 26, 2018 rehearing regarding 20 different amendment issues the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) approved in previous meetings during the past few years. The BOCC was concerned that the residents were not fully aware of some of the amendments and we, the people were owed an additional hearing.

After Chairmen Wes Wootan dispensed with some routine rules and guidelines for the deliberations, he and Commissioner Corbus ruled rather quickly that the county did everything properly with regards to those 20 amendment items. Earlier this year the third official, Commissioner Hofer recused himself from any decision-making responsibilities regarding the Cat Creek Energy project because he was engaged in the negotiation process with John Faulkner’s Cat Creek Energy, LLC legal team.

This Cat Creek Energy project is quite complex and even Chairmen Wootan required some help and guidance closing out the deliberations and announcing an official decision on the rehearing. Both Bud Grant, the county’s legal counsel and Shelley Essl, the assistant clerk of the county commissioners, spoke up to ensure Wootan didn’t overstep on this important announcement.

While we are disappointed in the BOCC’s decision in this matter, there are still some hurdles that Cat Creek Energy, LLC will have to overcome before they can break ground on this project.

Notice: For your records, the official BOCC agenda item for this meeting was titled “Deliberation of Cat Creek Energy Rehearing held on July 26, 2018.”


Deliberation #2 – A ‘Big Win’ for the Residents of Elmore County

The second and final deliberations scheduled for the day involved an amendment to a development agreement between the county and Cat Creek Energy. The initial public hearing on this matter was conducted on Aug. 24, 2018, and mainly dealt with the water storage and delivery from a new 100,000 acre-foot reservoir that John Faulkner wants to build on the bluff directly above Anderson Ranch Reservoir. Specifically, 723 feet above Anderson.

Cat Creek Energy has been using this proposed new Cat Creek Reservoir as a big “carrot on a stick” and holding it in front of the county commissioner’s eyes since November 2016. It certainly appeared to many local residents that Cat Creek Energy was not so subtly trying to grease the skids in an effort to ensure the BOCC would approve their entire mega-energy project.

It is also the opinion of many residents that during the hearings in late 2016, Cat Creek did intimate that they would provide the county with a whole lot of water from Anderson Ranch Reservoir and get it into the Mountain Home area at no cost.

The commissioner’s deliberations on this issue were more meaty and substantial than during Deliberation #1. It became clear from the very beginning that Commissioner Wootan was in favor of approving Cat Creek Energy’s proposed amendment to the development agreement.

When Commissioner Bud Corbus offered up his opinion, it was obvious he was frustrated and maybe a little hot under the collar. That frustration was directed at the seven members of the Cat Creek Energy team in attendance at this meeting.

During the deliberations, Commissioner Corbus sternly lectured the Cat Creek Energy team over the following issues:

1. Corbus said he doesn’t think Elmore County should be put in a position of taking a risk on the costs of the water delivery from the proposed Cat Creek Reservoir.

In 2016 Cat Creek Energy said they were taking on all financial risks for the project and they were not asking Elmore County to take any risk. Corbus said ‘that has changed now’.

2. Corbus said he was having a lot of trouble believing the Nov. 2016 Cat Creek Energy’s promise that they would do anything they could to help Elmore County when in fact Cat Creek Energy stood in the county’s way when they protested Elmore County’s water application.

During a Nov. 2016 meeting, a Cat Creek Energy spokesman said “if there was anything they could do to help the county in the future we want to.” Corbus retorted, “I’m looking at a protested Elmore County water application and I’m asking myself how Cat Creek Energy is helping us by protesting that water permit.”

3. Corbus appeared a little hot under the collar when remembering that Cat Creek Energy told the county that if they sign the agreement, Cat Creek Energy wouldn’t protest the county water rights application.

To me that’s similar to blackmail. You sign this (agreement) and we won’t protest the water,” Corbus said.

Who in the hell is going to be telling us “you do this or else.” That’s not right. That’s not fair. That’s just absolutely not right”.”

4. Corbus said that a poster/flier created by Cat Creek Energy stated that transferring the water from The South Fork of the Boise River to the Mountain Home area wouldn’t be an issue but now there are issues … many issues.

And then there is a poster from those hearings. It says transferring the water from Cat Creek Reservoir to Little Camas and the to the Mountain Home area is not an issue. It doesn’t say on the poster anywhere that Elmore County is going to have to pay for it.

5. Corbus the went back to the fact that Cat Creek Energy official protested Elmore County’s water permit with the Idaho Department of Water Resources.

I read this Notice of Protest signed by John Faulkner and I read the reason why, and I was extremely disheartened. Again, who in the hell could be telling us [what to do] … who should deny the citizens of Elmore County water. I don’t think that’s right. I don’t think that’s fair and I really struggle with that.

In the end, Wootan restated his support for approving the first amendment to the development agreement. If the commissioners agreed to that amendment, the total cost of pumping water from the South Fork of the Boise River to the Mountain Home area would remain unknown and could easily skyrocket. Commissioner Corbus stated definitively he could not support the proposed amended.

The Development Agreement Amendment was not approved by Elmore County. That’s a win for the residents of the county.

In short, the vote was a one-one tie, meaning the proposed amendment was not approved during this September 7 meeting.

Moving Forward With the Development Agreement

It appears as if the signed and approved February 9, 2018 Development Agreement between Cat Creek Energy and Elmore County (download a copy of that development agreement here) … CCE_Development Agreement (9-Feb-2018)-10673026_1. is still in effect. However, the water storage and delivery portion that wasn’t approved during this September 7, 2018 meeting includes a December 31, 2018 deadline. If the county and Cat Creek Energy cannot hammer out an acceptable water storage and delivery agreement by the deadline, the CUP related to water will lapse.

The county has no further requirements or actions to take in regards to the development agreement, according to Elmore County Attorney Buzz Grant. However, we suspect the Cat Creek Energy legal team will be busy in the coming weeks trying to find some common ground with Elmore County surrounding this complex water issue.

Notice: For your records, the official BOCC agenda item for this meeting was titled “Deliberation of Amendment to the Cat Creek Energy Development Agreement.”

(Done) Sept. 7, 2018 – County ‘v’ Cat Creek Energy Meeting

On Friday, September 7, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. in the Elmore County Courthouse, the commissioners will hold two meeting regarding the Cat Creek Energy project and we want you to be there to stand silently in opposition to this mega-construction plan.

The first meeting will deal with 26 different issues Elmore County has concerns that they might not have given proper consideration to in many of the previous meetings held during the past 2.5 years. Some of those issues deal with the location and size of the 39 wind towers they wish to put up on Camas Prairie and electrical transmissions lines that could run helter-skelter through our backcounty. Plus we believe the threatened “Sage Grouse” certainly wouldn’t do well around those transmission lines or wind turbines.

Do we want wind turbines spread out from the Pine-Featherville Road and in the future possibly right down Highway 20 to the Teapot Dome area?

The subject of the second meeting is about a development agreement Cat Creek Energy wants to amend regarding the planned reservoir on Little Camas Prairie. There are a host of problems associated with this reservoir John Faulkner want to build. The worst issue is the very real possibility of a toxic blue-green algae cross-contamination bloom spreading into Anderson Ranch Reservoir.

“Who wants blue-green algae to close down recreation on Elmore County’s fishing and boating mecca?”


NEWS: County Commissioners Hold 2 Hearings on Aug. 24, 2018 – No Decisions


The Elmore County Commissioner held two hearings regarding the Cat Creek Energy project on August 24, 2018. The commissioners did not come to any decision about either of these very complex issues during this Friday afternoon meeting.

The First Hearing

The first hearing was the “Amendment to the Development Agreement Relative to Five Different Cat Creek Energy, LLC Conditional Use Permits (CUP).” This was the longer of the two hearings and the only individuals offering public testimony where the lawyers for the county, S Bar Ranch, and Cat Creek Energy.

Commissioners Wootan and Corbus dismissed, out of hand, the S Bar Ranch’s “Notice of Objections” claim. Both the county lawyer and the lawyer for the project said neither of the commissioners will personally benefit from Elmore County accepting water from the Cat Creek Energy hydro portion of the project.

We disagree with that opinion.

Cat Creek Energy indicated that all negotiations surrounding the development agreement were conducted with complete transparency. However, Commissioner Corbus did say the newly proposed agreement on precisely what the county would pay for water delivered to them is different than what most residents heard during the 2016 approval meetings. Corbus indicated he wasn’t happy with that turn of events.

In short, the county will pay Cat Creek Energy for the operations and maintenance costs of drawing water from Anderson Ranch Reservoir and pumping it into Little Camas Reservoir. Corbus said “operations and maintenance” cost is too broad of a description and could leave the county open to very high-cost water deliveries.

The Decision: As is the case with a public hearing like this, the commissioner deliberations and ultimately, a decision whether to approve the proposed amendment to the Development Agreement, will occur in two weeks or tentatively at 1:30 p.m. on Friday, September 7, 2018.

NOTE: It is highly unlikely that the commissioners will accept new public testimony on this issue. But, at the time, the commissioners did not state definitively that no further testimony would or could be accepted.

The Second Hearing – The Rehearing Deliberations

Deliberations and a decision on the Cat Creek Energy Rehearing stemming from the public hearing on July 26, 2018 was kicked down the road for two weeks. You can read about that issues by downloading the county documentation at

Commission Corbus indicated he wanted more time to read the large amount of “just dumped in his lap” information regarding the testimony from that July 26 public hearing.

We believe asking the residents for time to consider all testimony was a prudent move. The Cat Creek Energy team did not appear to appreciate this delay but Corbus did the correct thing … right?

The Decision: First things first … the commissioners will not accept any further public testimony on this issue. That was stated rather clearly at the hearing.

The commissioner’s deliberations and decision on this issue will occur at 1:30 p.m. on Friday, September 7, 2018, in the basement of the Elmore County Courthouse located at 150 South 4th East St, Mountain Home, ID 83647. Map Link:

Breaking News – S Bar Ranch Filed a Notice of Objections

On August 22, 2018, the S Bar Ranch filed a Notice of Objections with Elmore County alleging the county has a significant and irreconcilable conflict of interest/bias in its dealing with the Cat Creek Energy project.

To read the entire 5-page filing, point your browser to or right here …  Aug. 22, 2018 - Notice of Objections

Snippet from Notice of Objections:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that S Bar Ranch, LLC (“S Bar Ranch”) has objections for the hearing on August 24, 2018 (the “Hearing”) and the proposed actions of the Board of County Commissioners (the “Board”) with respect to the Cat Creek Energy, LLC Project—Conditional Use Permit CUP-2015-04 (the “hydro project”) and First Amendment to the Development Agreement that is the subject of the hearing.


The Board of Commissioners of Elmore County has a significant and irreconcilable conflict of interest/bias in this matter.

Under I.C. § 67-6506, a conflict of interest exists when a county grants a conditional use permit for the benefit of the county. The rule barring conflicts of interest in zoning matters is codified in I.C. § 67-6506:

A member or employee of a governing board, commission, or joint commission shall not participate in any proceeding or action when the member or employee or his employer, business partner, business associate, or any person related to him by affinity or consanguinity within the second degree has an economic interest in the procedure or action. Any actual or potential interest in any proceeding shall be disclosed at or before any meeting at which the action is being heard or considered. For purposes of this section the term “participation” means engaging in activities which constitute deliberations pursuant to the open meeting act. No member of a governing board or a planning and zoning commission with a conflict of interest shall participate in any aspect of the decision-making process concerning a matter involving the conflict of interest. A knowing violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor. I.C. § 67-6506 (emphasis added).

Idaho courts have interpreted the term “economic interest” broadly; any kind of direct or indirect pecuniary benefit qualifies. Martin v. Smith, No. 2008 WL 4727843 (Idaho Dist. Apr. 2, 2008)(order granting preliminary injunction). Idaho courts have also interpreted “participation”broadly, holding that it includes any action involved in the deliberation process. Manookian v.Blaine County, 735 P.2d 1008, 1012 (Idaho 1987) (“I.C. § 67-6506 prohibits a member…from participating even if he or she will not vote.”). A conflict of interest can also arise if the person participating in the proceeding is employed by an entity that is economically interested in the …

End of Snippet

The Last Nine Dev. Agreement Issue You Probably Didn’t Know About

Oregon wildfire smoke hanging thick over Camas Prairie is only temporary. The Cat Creek Energy project is a permanent blight on Elmore County.

Cat Creek Energy, LLC, and Elmore County’s Development Agreement … the last nine issue you probably didn’t know about.

Over the past week, we have highlighted most of the issues our county commissioners have agreed to when it comes to building a sprawling power generating facility in the mountains and prairies of Elmore County. These last 9 issues run the gamut from permanent buildings to private microwave communications towers to concrete and rock crushing plants.

Download and read the whole 37-page development agreement here …  CCE_Development Agreement (9-Feb-2018)-10673026_1.

All these approved plans just mean more disturbances to the local environment and our coveted wildlife, fish and big game animals. And these were likely approved just so Commissioners Wootan, Corbus and Hofer can point to a project they will call “their legacy.”

Don’t let this Cat Creek Energy project become a dark smear on the long and honorable history of Elmore County. It’s not worth it for anyone other than a few elected individuals and the Faulkner family.

The Last 9 Issues

18) A cellular and/or microwave communication tower up to two hundred (200) feet in height may be placed on any of the Property on the CUP sites subject to any federal requirements and state permitting.

19) Transmission level electrical towers are engineered to accommodate the topography and electrical conductor size on any CUP site.

20) Temporary housing can be built on the PSH CUP Site to accommodate the construction cycle as provided in 6-8-206 with an approved Administrative Decision and an approved building permit.

21) One permanent Caretaker/Security dwelling unit can be constructed within the PSH or Substation CUP boundaries as provided in 6-8-89 with an approved building permit.

22) One duplex dwelling unit can be constructed within the PSH or Substation CUP boundaries as provided in 6-8-93 with a Conditional Use Permit and an approved building permit.

23) Temporary housing to accommodate construction personnel is allowed during the construction activity period under 6-8-206 and must be removed within thirty (30) days after commercial operations of the final power generator facility commences.

24) Rock crushing is allowed during the construction period as provided in 6-8-164 and an approved Administrative Decision for a temporary use.

25) Concrete batch plants are allowed during the construction period as provided in 6-8-164and an approved Administrative Decision for a temporary use.

26) For fire safety, on site equipment shall include a tender, a pumper, and all necessary equipment for fire suppression.


Be There To Oppose the Project

At 2:30 p.m. on August 24, 2018, the Elmore County Commissioners will hear from the corporate lawyers for Cat Creek Energy, LLC to amend certain aspects of the Development Agreement they signed a little over six months ago. If you are opposed to this project, please attend this public hearing or contact the commissions and let them know you don’t want this project to be built in our backyard.

Here is a link to more information about that meeting

Contact Information for the County Commissioner

Al Hofer

Chairman Wes Wooten

Bud Corbus